Discussion about this post

User's avatar
UnionSlag's avatar

We understand the law just fine. We know what it implies. We know what effect it will have on our careers. Not jobs. Careers. We know the effect it will have on our taxes. We know the effect it will have on our ability to gain work, set our schedules, create opportunities. All of it.

The unions are a failing anacronism of the previous century, long past their relevance, and that is no more clearly represented by it's dwindling numbers. In a last ditch effort to regain it's financial and political power base, it has fallen back on the 1930's ABC test.

Collective bargaining in the US an other countries is an adversarial process, and has a long history of corruption and ties to organized crime. Freelancers, 57 million of them in the US, contributing 1.3 trillion to the US economy, want no part of that poisoned well, nor see any need to pay into the union dole to finance the union's now failing pension funds, political donations, and loans to organized crime.

Thank you for freelance-splaining to all of us, what we think, and continuing to further the false narrative that all freelancers have heard for the last year. "Oh, it's not a big deal, you just don't understand.

Are our taxes going up 60 percent a big deal?

Are our work schedules being dictated to us a big deal?

Is the fact that both women's and African American leaders have come out against the ProAct as racist and misogynist a big deal?

Is claiming the previous laws were "outdated," overturning decades of labor law, sending the courts into turmoil and placing the burden of creating new case law entirely on the backs of small businesses a big deal?

Please. For any one reading this. Everything he's saying is a lie. But it is informative as it illustrates almost every union talking point we've seen in the last year.

Brandon: Tell your bosses. They're not getting one dime of our income.

Expand full comment
Hb's avatar

Isn't your argument (the same as the unions) moot though, because the test still makes companies liable to comply with the abc test or else it's considered in violation of the NLRA? Even if it doesnt directly legislate all misclassification it forces companies to comply with this test eventually, or else not bother hiring ICs. I don't get your argument, as much as I'd love to stop fretting.

Expand full comment
36 more comments...

No posts